Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

Naomi Shihab Nye’s "The Man Who Hated Trees" is a darkly humorous yet deeply unsettling meditation on destruction, misplaced anger, and the ways in which people project their internal struggles onto the world around them. Through vivid imagery and a sharp, ironic tone, Nye portrays a man whose hatred of trees extends beyond mere annoyance, reflecting a deeper hostility toward life, growth, and connection. The poem explores how destruction—whether of trees, relationships, or community—often stems from something unresolved within a person, leading to a strikingly modern critique of control, entitlement, and alienation.

The opening line immediately establishes a surreal yet troubling premise: "When he started blaming robberies on trees, you knew for sure something was wrong." The absurdity of the accusation signals that this man’s perspective is not grounded in reality. Instead of seeing trees as symbols of life, beauty, or shade, he casts them as enablers of crime. His paranoia and resentment distort his perception of the natural world, making trees scapegoats for larger fears. This irrationality sets the stage for the poem’s exploration of how personal frustration and misdirected anger can escalate into acts of destruction.

The man is then introduced through his profession: "This man who clipped hair, who spent years shaving the necks of cafeteria managers, sweeping lost curls down drains." The detail that he is a barber is significant—he is someone accustomed to cutting, shaping, and controlling. His profession requires precision, yet the poem suggests a dangerous inclination: "It is always better to cut off a little too much..." This philosophy, when applied to trees instead of hair, becomes ominous. The idea that it is better to overdo it—to take more than necessary—reveals his underlying impulse toward excess and erasure.

Nye presents a disturbing psychological shift: "You could say he transferred / one thing to another when he came home, hair to leaves, only this time he was cutting down whole bodies, from the feet up, he wanted to make those customers stumps." This chilling comparison equates his approach to trees with an act of violence. While trimming hair is a temporary, harmless change, cutting trees down to stumps is permanent, an obliteration of life. His actions take on a sinister quality, suggesting that his desire for control extends beyond his profession and into his environment.

His justifications for cutting down trees reveal a selfish and cynical worldview: "This tree drops purple balls on the roof of my car. / That tree touches the rain gutter. / I don't like blossoms, too much mess. / Trees take up the sky. / It's my light, why share it?" Each complaint is minor, yet his responses are extreme. He views trees not as part of a shared ecosystem but as personal intrusions. The final statement—"It's my light, why share it?"—is particularly revealing. It suggests a possessiveness, an unwillingness to coexist with the natural world or even acknowledge its benefits. His desire for control manifests as an unwillingness to share space, light, or life itself.

His paranoia extends beyond aesthetics to crime: "He said thieves struck more on blocks where there were trees. / 'The shade, you know. They like the dark.'" This assertion reinforces his tendency to assign blame irrationally. Instead of seeing trees as protective or beneficial, he links them to danger, justifying their removal through a twisted logic. This reflects a broader fear—of uncertainty, of things beyond his control, of imagined threats that lurk in the shade. His worldview is one of division: trees are not neutral, they are obstacles; they do not provide beauty, they conceal criminals.

The poem’s tone darkens further: "You lived for days with the buzz of his chain-saw searing off the last little branches of neighborly affection." Here, the chainsaw becomes a metaphor not just for physical destruction but for the severing of social ties. His war on trees is not just his own; it affects the entire neighborhood, diminishing the shared landscape and, symbolically, the spirit of the community. The phrase "neighborly affection" being "seared off" suggests that his actions create isolation, that his destruction is not just about trees but about eroding relationships.

Nye contrasts his actions with the natural rhythms of the town: "It was planting-season in the rest of the town but your street received a crew-cut." The juxtaposition is striking. While others are nurturing growth, he is enforcing sterility. The "crew-cut" metaphor reinforces his rigid sense of order and control, but it also signals an unnatural barrenness—a forced, stark contrast to the season of renewal happening elsewhere.

The destruction culminates in a grotesque scene: "He gloated on his porch surrounded by amputations." The word "amputations" gives the image a disturbingly human quality, likening the severed trees to severed limbs. The imagery grows even more violent: "You caught him staring greedily / at the loose branches swinging over your roof." His hunger for cutting is insatiable—his gaze suggests that even after clearing his own property, he is already considering further destruction.

The poem then shifts into a question: "Tomorrow, when everything was cut, what then?" This rhetorical inquiry exposes the emptiness of his obsession. After erasing every perceived obstacle, after claiming control over every tree in sight, what remains? There is no joy in absence, no triumph in barrenness. The destruction does not bring satisfaction—only more emptiness.

The final lines deepen the unsettling portrait of this man: "He joked about running over cats as the last chinaberry crashed, / as the truck came to gather arms and legs, fingers waving their last farewell." The image of the tree limbs as "arms and legs, fingers waving" reinforces the violent undercurrent of the poem. His disregard for life extends beyond trees; even his humor is cruel. The mention of "running over cats" further illustrates his detachment from empathy.

The closing lines ask the most haunting question: "What stories did he tell himself, this patriot of springtime, / and how did it feel to down sprouting boulevards / with his bald bald heart?" The phrase "patriot of springtime" is deeply ironic—spring is a season of growth, yet he has devoted himself to destruction. The repetition of "bald" emphasizes his emptiness, suggesting that in his relentless cutting, he has stripped himself of something essential. His heart, like the landscape he has altered, is now barren.

"The Man Who Hated Trees" is a chilling exploration of control, destruction, and the projections of personal frustration onto the world. Naomi Shihab Nye uses sharp irony and haunting imagery to expose the consequences of unchecked resentment—how a man’s obsession with order and control leads to not only the erasure of nature but the erosion of his own humanity. The poem suggests that the urge to destroy often masks deeper wounds, that hostility toward life is ultimately hostility toward the self. In the end, the man’s war on trees leaves nothing behind but stark emptiness—a reflection of his own "bald bald heart."

Copyright (c) 2025 PoetryExplorer

Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!

Other Poems of Interest...