![]() |
Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained | |||
From the outset, the speaker confronts the reader with the paradox of their existence: a person whose profession revolves around war, yet who makes every effort to appear unthreatening and conform to societal norms in personal settings. The imagery of dressing in "unalarming shades of beige" and smelling of "lavender" juxtaposes sharply with the historian's intimate acquaintance with "courage and atrocities." This contrast serves to highlight the chasm between the historian's professional engagement with war and the societal expectation for women to be peacemakers, nurturers, or mourners. Atwood skillfully addresses the gendered expectations surrounding discussions of war. The poem critiques the notion that women should not "contemplate war" or "weigh tactics impartially," instead relegating them to roles of passive support or victims of war's ravages. The biting sarcasm in suggesting that women's functions are to "hand out white feathers to arouse bravery" or "hang themselves with their own hair" after being raped underscores the absurdity of limiting women's engagement with war to traditional roles of moral support or as collateral damage. The historian's declaration that they "tell what I hope will pass as truth" underscores the poem's engagement with the concept of historical truth. The acknowledgment that "The truth is seldom welcome, especially at dinner" speaks to the discomfort that real, unembellished accounts of war bring to polite society. The historian's role is depicted as one of bearing witness to humanity's capacity for violence without judgment, a stance that isolates them from those who prefer the sanitized, glorified narratives of war. Atwood's depiction of the historian's dreams filled with the "glamour" of historical warfare contrasts with the grim reality they know to be true. The poem demystifies romanticized notions of war, pointing out that behind the tales of heroism and valor lie brutality, chance, and the mundane factors like "potatoes, / or the absence of them" that can determine the outcomes of conflicts. This demystification process not only challenges traditional narratives of war but also reflects the historian's internal conflict between fascination with their subject and the despair it often engenders. The historian's reflections on visiting battlefields that have since returned to peace serve as a poignant commentary on the transient nature of human memory and the attempts to commemorate war through monuments and "sad marble angels." Yet, these symbols of remembrance cannot capture the full scope of war's horror, nor can they reconcile the historian's deep knowledge of war's futility with the ongoing cycle of conflict and peace. In concluding, the historian's statement on the ubiquity of war, with "four hundred years of war" for every year of peace, encapsulates the poem's meditation on the inescapable nature of conflict in human history. Atwood presents the military historian not just as a chronicler of war, but as a figure embodying the tension between the desire to understand human violence and the longing for a world where such understanding is no longer necessary. "The Loneliness of the Military Historian" is a powerful reflection on the personal cost of engaging with the darkest aspects of human history. Through the lens of a female military historian, Atwood challenges societal norms, questions the glorification of war, and confronts the reader with the uncomfortable truths that lie beneath the surface of historical narratives.
| Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!Other Poems of Interest...BETWEEN THE WARS by ROBERT HASS I AM YOUR WAITER TONIGHT AND MY NAME IS DIMITRI by ROBERT HASS MITRAILLIATRICE by ERNEST HEMINGWAY RIPARTO D'ASSALTO by ERNEST HEMINGWAY WAR VOYEURS by JUAN FELIPE HERRERA THE DREAM OF WAKING by RANDALL JARRELL THE SURVIVOR AMONG GRAVES by RANDALL JARRELL SO MANY BLOOD-LAKES by ROBINSON JEFFERS |
|