![]() |
Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained | |||
In "The Sentence," Robert Creeley explores the intersection of love, language, and identity, suggesting that relationships are shaped by both physical connection and a quest for continuity and self-definition. Through a carefully constructed metaphor, he equates the structure of love to the syntax of language, emphasizing the ways in which intimacy seeks both unity and autonomy. The poem’s title, "The Sentence," implies a double meaning: not only does it refer to a linguistic construction, but it also hints at a sense of fate or obligation—perhaps the binding nature of commitment and self-expression within a relationship. The opening lines, “There is that in love / which, by the syntax of,” introduce love as something defined and structured, as if it follows rules akin to grammar or sentence construction. The phrase “syntax of” suggests that love, like language, is organized, shaped by rules and patterns that people adhere to, consciously or unconsciously. By framing love in terms of syntax, Creeley implies that relationships have an inherent structure, a kind of order that determines how people connect and communicate. This choice of metaphor highlights how language and love both require a delicate balance between individuality and cohesion, where each part plays a specific role within a larger framework. The line “men find women and join / their bodies to their minds” suggests that love involves both a physical and an intellectual union. The phrase “join their bodies to their minds” emphasizes the dual nature of intimacy, suggesting that true connection occurs not just on a physical level but also through mental and emotional alignment. Creeley’s choice of words here highlights the ideal of a holistic partnership, one that encompasses both the tangible and intangible aspects of human experience. This unity of body and mind reflects a desire for complete connection, where two individuals come together as one cohesive entity. However, the construction of the line—“men find women”—also subtly reflects traditional gender roles, which may hint at underlying expectations or conventions that shape relationships. The second stanza, beginning with “which wants so to acquire / a continuity, a place,” expresses a longing for stability and purpose within the relationship. The word “wants” imbues love with a desire or need for grounding, as if relationships inherently seek to establish a lasting presence. “Continuity” suggests an unbroken connection, an ongoing narrative that gives meaning and structure to life. This desire for continuity reflects the human need to feel secure within a relationship, to know that it is more than a fleeting experience. Similarly, “a place” implies that love seeks a specific role or position within one’s life, a defined place where it can be nurtured and sustained. This line reinforces the notion that love, like language, is a means of creating meaning, providing a framework in which individuals can situate themselves and feel part of something larger. “A demonstration that it must / be one’s own sentence” brings the metaphor full circle, suggesting that love ultimately serves as a form of self-expression, an extension of one’s identity. The word “demonstration” implies that love is not just felt but enacted, performed, or shown—something that can be observed and understood. “One’s own sentence” reinforces the idea that each relationship is unique, crafted by the individuals involved. Just as every sentence is distinct, shaped by the words and syntax chosen by the speaker, so too is each relationship defined by the choices and actions of the people within it. This line captures the desire for autonomy within unity, the need for love to reflect the individuality of both partners even as it brings them together. The term “sentence” also suggests a sense of finality or commitment, as if love is a kind of fate or obligation that one willingly accepts. To make it “one’s own sentence” implies ownership, a willingness to embrace the terms and structure of the relationship, while also acknowledging its binding nature. This dual meaning reflects the complexities of love—how it can feel both liberating and confining, a source of identity and responsibility. By calling love a “sentence,” Creeley subtly hints at the ways relationships can both define and limit us, setting boundaries within which we live out our desires and aspirations. In "The Sentence," Robert Creeley uses the metaphor of syntax to examine the structure and nature of love, revealing it as a balance between unity and individuality, commitment and self-expression. The poem suggests that love, like language, is an essential framework through which people find meaning and connection. Through the careful construction of each line, Creeley highlights the complexities of intimacy, showing how love is both a shared journey and a personal creation, a “sentence” that binds individuals together while allowing them to express their unique identities. Ultimately, "The Sentence" invites readers to consider how relationships shape and are shaped by the desires and choices of those involved, offering a nuanced view of love as both a source of connection and a deeply personal act of self-definition.
| Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!Other Poems of Interest...NEW SEASON by MICHAEL S. HARPER THE INVENTION OF LOVE by MATTHEA HARVEY TWO VIEWS OF BUSON by ROBERT HASS A LOVE FOR FOUR VOICES: HOMAGE TO FRANZ JOSEPH HAYDN by ANTHONY HECHT AN OFFERING FOR PATRICIA by ANTHONY HECHT LATE AFTERNOON: THE ONSLAUGHT OF LOVE by ANTHONY HECHT A SWEETENING ALL AROUND ME AS IT FALLS by JANE HIRSHFIELD |
|