![]() |
Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained | |||
"How We Heard the Name" by Alan Dugan offers a vivid and poignant perspective on the effects of war, coupled with a profound reflection on history and memory. Through the narrative of debris and individuals carried downstream by a river—a timeless symbol of the flow of time and the inevitability of change—Dugan encapsulates the transient yet impactful nature of historical events on the consciousness of those who witness their aftermath. The poem begins with a stark depiction of the river's cargo: "dead horses, dead men / and military debris, indicative of war / or official acts upstream." This imagery sets a grim scene, highlighting the destructive aftermath of conflict as it quite literally flows into the lives of the bystanders downstream. The river, in this context, becomes a conveyor of the past, bringing evidence of human strife and the remnants of battle into the quieter realms away from the immediate violence. Dugan’s phrase "but it went by, it all / goes by, that is the thing / about the river" emphasizes the inevitable passing of time and events. The river does not stop to let observers fully grasp the tragedy; it simply continues its course, mirroring the way historical events enter and exit the public consciousness, leaving traces that must be interpreted by those who encounter them. The narrative then introduces a solitary figure, a soldier on a log, who appears inebriated and detached from the gravity of the situation symbolized by the river's grim freight. When questioned by the onlookers, the soldier reveals that "the great / Battle of Granicus / has just been won / by all of the Greeks except / the Lacedaemonians and / myself." His words not only provide a specific historical anchor—the Battle of Granicus, fought by Alexander the Great—but also introduce a personal element to the recounting of this event. The mention of the Lacedaemonians (Spartans) who did not participate in the battle adds a layer of historical nuance, suggesting divisions and exceptions within what might seem like unified causes. The soldier's claim that his separation from the battle is "a joke / between me and a man / named Alexander, whom / all of you ba-bas / will hear of as a god" introduces irony and personalizes the historical narrative. This remark frames Alexander the Great not just as a historical figure but as a character in the soldier’s personal story, adding a layer of myth-making to the recounting of history. The soldier's foresight that Alexander will be remembered as a god-like figure speaks to the transformation of historical figures into mythical entities over time, shaped by the stories told about them. Through the use of casual dialogue and vivid imagery, Dugan captures a moment where history is both made and relayed in a personal and impactful manner. The poem reflects on how individuals caught in the sweep of great events perceive and narrate their experiences, contributing to the larger tapestry of historical memory. "How We Heard the Name" subtly critiques the glorification of historical figures and highlights the often overlooked personal and human aspects of historical events, questioning the ways in which history is remembered and idolized.
| Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!Other Poems of Interest...ALEXANDER by JOHN STUART BLACKIE THE SPEAKING TREE by MURIEL RUKEYSER ALEXANDER'S FEAST; OR, THE POWER OF MUSIC by JOHN DRYDEN THE HIGH-PRIEST TO ALEXANDER by ALFRED TENNYSON THE BALLAD OF ISKANDER by JAMES ELROY FLECKER IN PRAISE OF WYATT'S PSALMS by HENRY HOWARD ALEXANDER AND PHILIP by LETITIA ELIZABETH LANDON ALEXANDER ON THE BANKS OF THE HYPHASIS by LETITIA ELIZABETH LANDON |
|