Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

"A Lesson in Vengeance" by Sylvia Plath is a poem that delves into the complexities of human will, punishment, and the methods used to exercise control-either over one's environment or oneself. Written in Plath's characteristically rich and complex language, the poem spans multiple historical periods and cultures to explore the idea of vengeance in its many forms.

The poem opens with an evocative description of "dour ages," a time of "drafty cells and draftier castles," where myth and reality intertwine-dragons breathe "without the frame of fables." Here, Plath seems to be exploring an era when the lines between myth and reality were blurred, perhaps a critique or nostalgia for a time when belief systems were not questioned, or for periods where moral quandaries were not just matters of personal interpretation but were metaphysical realities.

In these older ages, obstruction was conquered not through "miracle or majestic means," but through spiteful and overzealous abuse-thumb screws, drowned horses. Plath introduces two historical figures to illustrate this: Suso, a German mystic and monk who was known for his extreme acts of self-punishment in the name of God; and Cyrus, the founder of the Persian Empire, who punished the River Gyndes by dividing it into 360 trickles after one of his sacred horses drowned in it. Both figures act out of an unyielding, almost obsessive belief in their own righteousness or divine mission.

Suso's extreme mortification of his flesh is compared with Cyrus's vengeful act against a natural element, both manifestations of a kind of "vengeance" against what obstructs them-either spiritual purity or imperial expansion. Plath might be critiquing these extreme measures or perhaps exploring the lengths people go to when they are spurred by deep-seated belief or emotion. The different forms of vengeance-self-inflicted in the quest for heaven or exerted upon nature as a form of imperial dominance-highlight the complexities and perhaps even absurdities of human will.

However, Plath contrasts these historical figures with "latter-day sages" who subdue their enemies "neatly, nicely, by disbelief or bridges," suggesting that contemporary forms of control or conquest are far more insidious and less overt. This raises questions about the progress we claim as a society: are we truly more civilized or simply more subtle in our methods of control and vengeance?

In her exploration of human behavior across time, Plath does not merely narrate; she critically engages with our understanding of virtue and vice, punishment and reward. The devil in the grain of the marrow symbolizes the innate proclivity for humans to seek control through whatever means available, a kind of eternal vengeance embedded in the human psyche, beyond the reach of time or cultural change.

The poem doesn't strictly follow a consistent rhyme scheme, adding a free-flowing narrative quality that allows Plath to sweep across centuries and subjects. However, occasional rhymes like "means" and "abuses" or "trickles" and "chuckles" serve to emphasize key points, subtly demanding the reader's attention at crucial moments.

In "A Lesson in Vengeance," Sylvia Plath offers a rich tapestry of history, belief, and human psychology. She traverses cultures and religions to delve deep into the human soul, questioning whether the tools of vengeance and control have really changed or if they've merely adapted to new forms. Through her incisive exploration of this challenging subject, she forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about the nature of human will and the eternal, unchanging aspects of our quest for control.

Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!

Other Poems of Interest...