![]() |
Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained | |||
James Schuyler’s poem "May, 1972" juxtaposes the serene beauty of a suburban spring with the brutal realities of war, creating a striking contrast that underscores the poet’s internal conflict and moral contemplation. The poem’s reflective tone and vivid imagery capture the tension between the natural world’s cyclical renewal and the ongoing devastation of human conflict, revealing the poet’s deep anguish over the Vietnam War. The poem opens with a simple observation: "Soft May mists are here again." This line sets the scene in a tranquil, almost idyllic environment, where the gentle mist of May signals the return of spring. The repetition of "here" and "there" throughout the poem emphasizes the stark division between the peaceful setting the poet occupies and the distant war zone. The word "again" suggests a cyclical pattern, as if the arrival of May is an expected, comforting return. However, this cyclical natural beauty is immediately contrasted with the harsh reality of war: "There, the war goes on." The abrupt shift in focus highlights the dissonance between the poet’s immediate surroundings and the distant but persistent conflict. The poem continues to explore this dissonance through contrasting imagery. The "creamy white tulips" and "green grass buttoned down with dandelions" evoke a sense of purity, renewal, and innocence. These natural elements are symbols of life and rebirth, typical of spring, yet they are juxtaposed against the "foliage [that] curls blackened back"—a metaphor for the destruction caused by war. The poem raises a haunting question: "But when?" This question, left unanswered, lingers in the air, reflecting the uncertainty and despair felt by those who long for the war’s end. Schuyler's use of the cardinal, whose song "enchants" the poet, serves as another reminder of the natural world’s persistent beauty and harmony, which stands in stark contrast to the chaos of war. The cardinal’s song is a moment of peace, a brief escape from the horrors that the poet knows are happening elsewhere. Yet, this escape is fleeting, as the poet quickly reasserts that "All war is wrong." This declaration is not a mere opinion but a deeply felt truth, underscored by the poet’s inability to reconcile the beauty of his surroundings with the violence occurring far away. The imagery of the "parrot tulips" looking "like twisted guts" is particularly powerful, blending the beauty of nature with the grotesque reality of war. The "twisted guts" evoke images of bodily harm and suffering, and the tulips, often associated with grace and delicacy, become a disturbing symbol of the war’s impact. This metaphor suggests that even the most beautiful aspects of life can be tainted by the horrors of violence. The poet’s internal struggle is further articulated through rhetorical questions: "Can we, in simple justice, desert our sought allies? / Draw out: I do not know." These lines capture the poet’s moral dilemma—whether to continue supporting the war out of a sense of obligation or to withdraw, acknowledging the war’s inherent wrongness. The poet admits to uncertainty, reflecting the broader societal conflict of the time, where many grappled with the ethics of the Vietnam War. As the poem draws to a close, Schuyler makes a poignant statement: "Children are more valuable than flowers: what a choice to make!" This line distills the poet’s anguish into a simple, yet profound truth. The comparison of children to flowers underscores the tragedy of war, where the innocence and potential of youth are sacrificed. The poet’s plea, "The war must end," is both a personal and universal cry for peace, yet it is immediately followed by the resigned acknowledgment that "It goes on." This ending leaves the reader with a sense of hopelessness, as the poet recognizes the ongoing nature of the conflict, despite his longing for its conclusion. "May, 1972" is a deeply emotional and reflective poem that captures James Schuyler’s struggle to reconcile the beauty of the natural world with the senselessness of war. Through his use of contrasting imagery and poignant questioning, Schuyler explores the moral complexities of the Vietnam War, ultimately conveying a powerful anti-war message. The poem serves as a reminder of the enduring conflict between the ideals of peace and the realities of human violence, a conflict that continues to resonate in the modern world.
| Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!Other Poems of Interest...TO THE HAWKS by DONALD JUSTICE A SECOND-HAND ELEGY; FOR DOUGLAS DICKEY, PFC., USMC by MICHAEL ANANIA AT A MARCH AGAINST THE VIETNAM WAR (LATER VERSION) by ROBERT BLY ON BEING ASKED TO WRITE A POEM AGAINST THE WAR IN VIETNAM by HAYDEN CARRUTH HOMELESS COMPLEYNT by ALLEN GINSBERG IN THAI BINH (PEACE) PROVINCE by DENISE LEVERTOV WEEPING WOMAN by DENISE LEVERTOV WAITER IN A CALIFORNIA VIETNAMESE RESTURANT by CLARENCE MAJOR |
|