![]() |
Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained | |||
Dara Wier’s "Who Is God? So Asked Our Dog" is a poem that unspools as a series of questions—playful, philosophical, and deeply inquisitive—mimicking both the innocent curiosity of a child and the existential probing of a seeker. The form of the poem evokes a kind of catechism, yet instead of offering doctrinal answers, it leaves every query open, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty, wonder, and unresolved mystery. The title itself is delightfully whimsical: “Who Is God? So Asked Our Dog.” The reversal of expected agency—an animal posing a theological question—immediately situates the poem in a world where logic and hierarchy are upended. It is a nod to both the idea that animals might possess their own spiritual awareness and the human tendency to project our uncertainties onto the world around us. The title also hints at a more profound theological paradox: if God is beyond human comprehension, why not assume that a dog, with its pure instincts and immediate experience of the world, might be just as capable of grasping the divine? The first set of questions—“How many seasons are there? / Where was God born? / How many stars?”—begins with the factual and expands into the cosmic. The inquiry about seasons grounds the speaker in observable natural cycles, but then leaps into the more metaphysical “Where was God born?”—a question that presumes divinity has an origin point, an assumption that defies most theological understandings of God as eternal. The query about the stars then shifts the focus to the incomprehensibility of the universe, hinting at the limits of human knowledge. The poem then turns to historical and colonial questions: “Who discovered every single one of the Americas and all of the other places?” This line, with its exaggerated phrasing (“every single one”), subtly critiques the colonialist notion of discovery, implying that the concept is absurd—how can one discover a place already inhabited? The inclusion of “all of the other places” suggests a world infinitely larger than any one civilization’s narrative, challenging simplified historical accounts. A shift occurs with: “Do some dwarves live in caves?” This question introduces a touch of folklore, mythology, and childhood imagination. The contrast between grand cosmic queries and playful, almost childlike concerns creates a tone that is both profound and humorous, reinforcing the poem’s embrace of uncertainty. Religious imagery returns with: “Is your mother singing in church tonight? / Is your father setting his hat on his head?” These lines humanize the search for meaning, placing it within the domestic and the everyday. The mother singing in church suggests faith, ritual, and devotion, while the father setting his hat on his head suggests preparation, movement, and tradition. These quiet, almost cinematic images contrast with the earlier grandiose inquiries, reminding us that spirituality often resides in the smallest of gestures. The poem then takes a strange and delightful turn: “Do those goldfish belong to you?” This question—seemingly mundane—echoes deeper philosophical concerns about ownership, stewardship, and responsibility. Who owns anything in the grand scheme? Does anyone own life, or do we merely borrow it? Another sharp shift follows: “Why did their God rise from the dead? / Could it be because of a forgotten pencil?” This juxtaposition is absurdist and profound. The resurrection—a foundational event in Christian theology—is linked to something as trivial as a forgotten pencil. The humor here does not diminish the theological weight of the question but instead underscores how mysterious and arbitrary divine action can seem from a human perspective. The next questions—“Do you like to study history? / Is this your book? / Where does cotton grow?”—return to the theme of knowledge, possession, and origin. The book could be literal, but it could also refer to scripture, to history itself, to the written record of humanity’s attempts to answer the very questions this poem poses. Religious history comes back into play with: “Why did the Holy Family go to Egypt. What is the Holy Family?” The reference to Mary, Joseph, and Jesus fleeing to Egypt evokes themes of exile, migration, and survival, but the second question (“What is the Holy Family?”) opens up another layer—does Holy signify something beyond the traditional biblical story? What families are sacred? Is holiness something we define for ourselves? Then, suddenly: “Do you see frightened ghosts on the streets sometimes?” This spectral intrusion suggests a world haunted by the past, by unresolved traumas, by the remnants of those who once were. In a poem about God and existence, ghosts complicate the idea of an afterlife—do the dead linger, lost? Are we ever truly gone? A moment of surreal intimacy follows: “I see the dog in your eye.” The phrase is cryptic, evocative, poetic. The speaker’s vision merges with the questioner’s, creating a moment of mutual recognition. If the dog was the one asking about God, does seeing the dog in someone’s eye mean they are now the seeker? The penultimate question feels like an existential sigh: “How would you like this to end?” This could refer to the poem itself, to a life, to history, to suffering. The open-endedness forces the reader to participate in the questioning, to acknowledge their own desires about finality and resolution. The poem then circles back to its original seeker: “Gone was a dog off to where a dog wants to go.” The line suggests freedom, instinct, and acceptance—perhaps the dog has found its answer in simply moving forward. The closing questions return to themes of dependency and fate: “Who needed some help from old friends?” The phrasing implies that we all do, that survival and understanding are communal. The last line is a wry, philosophical wink: “Somewhat maligned Pandora remains a curious person.” Pandora, the figure from Greek mythology who unleashed both evils and hope into the world, is here described not as reckless or doomed but as curious. This reframing suggests that curiosity—rather than being a fatal flaw—is an essential trait, one that makes us human. Wier’s "Who Is God? So Asked Our Dog" is both a meditation on existential inquiry and a playful subversion of the way we traditionally seek knowledge. By structuring the poem entirely as questions, she forces the reader into the role of seeker, emphasizing that certainty is elusive, if not impossible. The mixture of profound theological inquiries, everyday observations, and absurdist juxtapositions reflects the chaotic, often contradictory nature of human thought. The poem suggests that questions, rather than answers, define our experience. It also implies that meaning is personal, relational—whether found in goldfish, ghosts, or forgotten pencils. And the dog? Perhaps the dog is the perfect philosopher, unburdened by the need for certainty, content to simply ask and then move on.
| Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!Other Poems of Interest...THE MOUNTAIN IS STRIPPED by DAVID IGNATOW AS CLOSE AS BREATHING by MARK JARMAN UNHOLY SONNET 1 by MARK JARMAN UNHOLY SONNET 13 by MARK JARMAN BIRTH-DUES by ROBINSON JEFFERS THE SILENT SHEPHERDS by ROBINSON JEFFERS GOING TO THE HORSE FLATS by ROBINSON JEFFERS |
|