![]() |
Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained | |||
Marie Howe’s "For Three Days" is a deeply personal meditation on the emotional turbulence of waiting for a loved one to either survive or die. The poem wrestles with the contradictory nature of hope and grief, showing how the mind simultaneously clings to possibility while preparing for loss. Through its narrative of uncertainty, it captures the way fear compels us to rehearse sorrow before it arrives, sometimes even welcoming it as a form of control. The poem opens with the speaker?s desire to find another word for "gratitude," revealing an unease with the term. Gratitude in this context is not simple relief—it is knotted with guilt, shame, and the awareness of how close loss came. The speaker’s brother "could have died and didn’t," situating the family in a space between mourning and relief. The reference to "a week in the intensive care unit" establishes the suspended nature of time, where each day is filled with waiting and trying "not to imagine how it would be then, afterwards." The very act of resisting these thoughts only makes them more vivid. The speaker’s younger brother, Andy, articulates the brutal uncertainty of the situation: "I don’t know if I’ll be talking with John today, or buying a pair of pants for his funeral." His bluntness is shocking and painful, and the speaker’s immediate reaction is "I hated him for saying it because it was true and seemed to tilt it." There is an almost superstitious belief here—that naming the possibility of death might make it more real. Yet Andy’s statement captures the surreal limbo of waiting for a prognosis, where the mundane and the catastrophic exist side by side. The poem acknowledges the speaker’s own conflicted thoughts: "I had been writing his elegy in my head during the seven-hour drive there and trying not to." This confession is poignant—it reveals the way the mind, in the face of fear, constructs narratives of grief as a way to prepare for what might come. The reference to "Schrödinger’s Cat" reinforces this dual reality: the idea that the brother might be dead or alive simultaneously, depending on whether one dares to look. Here, thought itself becomes dangerous, as if imagining the worst might bring it into existence. The lines "And then it got better, and then it got worse" underscore the seesaw of medical uncertainty, each improvement tempered by the fear of relapse. The speaker acknowledges that "it’s a story now: He came back." Survival, once uncertain, has become something that can be told as a past event. But the speaker’s admission—"And I did, by that time, imagine him dead"—reveals a residual guilt. By preparing for his death, had she, in some way, betrayed him? The poem then takes a turn toward biblical allusion, referencing the Gospel of John’s account of Lazarus. "I can’t help but think of that woman who said to him whom she considered her savior: If thou hadst been here my brother had not died." This moment of doubt and faith resonates with the speaker’s own experience: the helplessness of watching a loved one teeter between life and death, and the wish for an intervention that might undo suffering. The comparison aligns the speaker with Martha, who both mourns her brother’s death and chastises Jesus for not arriving sooner. The emotional weight of this moment is enormous—hope, anger, and faith collapse into a single plea. In the final lines, the poem shifts to the miraculous return: "how she too might have stood trembling, unable to meet the eyes of the dear familiar figure that stumbled from the cave." The resurrection of Lazarus is not only an act of divine mercy but also an overwhelming moment of reckoning. The speaker suggests that even when prayers are answered, the weight of the experience is not easily shed. The "compassionate fist of God" is both saving and crushing, filling the woman with "gratitude and shame." These final words reveal the speaker’s own conflicted emotions—grateful that her brother survived, yet burdened by the knowledge of how deeply she had already grieved him. Ultimately, "For Three Days" is not just about a near-loss but about the ways the mind prepares for grief, sometimes too soon. The poem suggests that even when death is averted, the experience of anticipating it leaves an indelible mark. Gratitude, in this case, is not pure relief—it carries the weight of imagined mourning, the shame of having prepared for an absence that never came.
| Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!Other Poems of Interest...MARTHA WASHINGTON by SIDNEY LANIER MY PRETTY ROSE TREE, FR. SONGS OF EXPERIENCE by WILLIAM BLAKE THE TWO MYSTERIES by MARY ELIZABETH MAPES DODGE AT THE CANNON'S MOUTH by HERMAN MELVILLE PEARLS OF THE FAITH: 20. AL-'ALIM by EDWIN ARNOLD |
|